Restorative Practice Myth Buster Series Part 2

In part 2 of this series, I outline some further comments I hear about Restorative Practice and explain why they are just myths. 


6. Kids Can Just Learn to Say and Tell you What you Want to Hear! 


I have heard some educators suggest this or that we should be elusive around the RP questions so students don’t rehears them. This isn’t about an 'I caught ya’ it is about an ‘I see you’ – your potential to do better, your worthiness of our time and potential to be part of the solution. Trust around a restorative approach can indeed take time. Some of our students have been surviving in a hostile world/place and we need to give them a reason to disarm. Sharing power, an ability to affect change and be part of the solution is key to creating safety and authentic commitment to a restorative approach. Using accountability agreements and the 3 x Es of Fair Process (Engage, Explain and Expectation clarity) can support such commitment from our students who we may feel are only tokenisticly engaging. But also, making as generous assumptions as we can and choosing to believe in our students' potential to do better is important too. What human being wouldn’t choose to be in good relationship if they knew how to cultivate it or could tolerate the risk of it. As we know, such relationships aren’t built in a day but build daily.

Restorative Practice Myth Buster 1 - RP is About Being Positive All the Time

7. We Need to Make People Be Accountable


We can’t make people be accountable. We create conditions that cultivates accountability. Accountability and community are inextricable linked, when I feel like I belong here, like I matter, like I am connected, then I am accountable to this space. This is why it is important to intentionally build relationships, and also separate the deed form the doer when things go wrong, to promote the understanding that we are greater than the harm we have caused. Kay Pranis invites us to consider the notion of collective accountability - what needs to change in each of us, to take care of all of us? And what characteristics of the institution are part of the harm? Some of our students will find it difficult to have success in very rigid structures so it is important to have healthy boundaries and also looking at addressing unmet needs of our environment to create healthy communities. Community & accountability are inextricably linked!

Restorative Practice Myth Buster 2: RP Takes Too Much Time

8. RP Solves all Our Problems 


Absolutely not – nothing will! When we are dealing with human beings there is no tick the box guarantees, there is no magic formula. RP isn't about tips and tricks to get the kids to behave, there is no list to ensure 'success'. This is about relationships, it's about nurturing connection, empathy, safety and accountability and we can never underestimate the power of planting such seeds. But it can be really hard at times, especially when we are dealing with complex unmet needs and students that find it difficult to tolerate the risk of connection. It can be hard and it won’t guarantee success if we are defining that by compliance, but neither will a punitive approach otherwise we wouldn’t be dealing with a school to prison pipeline. Both a restorative and punitive approach can be hard so just pick your hard! 


For me, a restorative approach echoes who I want to be in the world but it doesn’t solve all my problems, just offers a scaffold, compass and way of relational thinking to try to navigate them in community.



Restorative Practice Myth Buster No. 3 : RP is a Soft Approach

9. RP in Schools is All about Supporting 'Wrongdoers' Instead of 'Victims' 



A zero-tolerance approach to bullying is very damaging because we tend to send the behaviour underground rather than identify or meeting the need driving the behaviour in the first place. People engaging with bullying behaviour then just get more astute around not getting caught. A restorative approach is also about giving everyone a seat at the table, empowering those that have been affected or harmed to acknowledge this and identify what they need to move forward – which is usually safety, a reassurance that the behaviour will stop. Removing a threat, through a suspension for example, is not the same as creating a sense of safety in the future when face to face with the person who has caused you harm. Suspensions are not the answer and an authentic restorative approach is voluntary fully-informed and usually more successful when part 

Restorative Practice Myth Buster 4 - RP is all about the Restorative Questions

10. RP Only ‘Works’ if the Kids Behave or Change



We need to challenge the understanding that ‘kids behave if they want to’ versus ‘kids behave if they can’. So much of what we see as misbehaviour is when our students are dysregulated, in struggle, connection-seeking, or simply a dysfunctional way to cope in the moment, a pattern of survival in a classroom/world where we have past hurts. When I think about success, it is not defined through conformity and if we used this as our compass sure we would have abandoned detentions and suspensions a long time ago as so many of our students are continuously in that punitive revolving door but we don’t seem to say ‘ oh I tried that detention once and it didn’t “work”’ as readily as we may say ‘ I tried a restorative chat once and it didn’t “work”’. Success lies in liking who we are, modelling communication we’d like to see mirrored back, investing in relationships and living our values. It’s just a practice and what we practice grows stronger but building new capacities and skills can take time and intentional effort- how do we learn a language or indeed a second language By being emerged within it or by seeking opportunities to practise!

Restorative Practice Myth Buster 5 - 5. There are no Rules So Kids Can Just Do What they Want

Do you want to get to know Restorative Practice better? Why not sign up to one of our Restorative Me plus workshops taking place over 2024.

Book 27th January Dublin West Book 26th April Cork
March 1, 2025
This idea that Restorative Practice is all about the Restorative Questions is a sentiment I hear a lot. Here, I would like to discuss some of the experiences I would have missed out on and some of the things I may not have learned had my learning in Restorative Practice stopped at the Restorative Questions. One of the most disappointing losses one might experience if you focus merely on the Restorative Questions is that of Positive Relationship Building. In September this year I met a little boy in my new class who was very shy, withdrawn and had little self-belief. He struggled academically and explained that he found school really hard sometimes. I was struck by how happy he appeared playing on the yard with his friends but how rapidly his demeanour changed when he re-entered the classroom. It didn’t take me long to figure out the classroom was not a place of safety or welcome for this child. At the end of the first week of school I gave the children big A3 blank white folders and asked them to design and decorate them as they saw fit. I suddenly saw this little boy light up. I went down to his desk and sat beside him. He talked more to me in those 10 minutes than he had for the full week. He explained that he loved to draw and that he created comic books at home. He was engaged, happy and very open with me and I began to see all the wonderful gifts and talents he possessed. From this encounter on, I took every opportunity to praise him for his creativity and to find ways to incorporate this into his learning. I have had the privilege of seeing this child grow in confidence over the last few months. Positive relationship building is something that comes very naturally to many teachers restoratively trained or not. However, what I have learned and what really helped me in this situation was to make this positive relationship building an explicit part of my teaching practise. To make time in the day to build relationships with my students. I have developed simple and manageable procedures such as a checklist of positive interactions to remind myself to praise all of my students. Had I not been using such strategies I may have lost out on this very positive experience and an affirming relationship with one of my students. Another area which falls outside the scope of the Restorative Questions, and is a huge benefit of Restorative Practice is it’s power to support and nurture student’s emotional literacy. In September, I met a group of students who had had little experience of Restorative Practice and I was concerned by their struggle to label and describe their emotions and at times to regulate these emotions. Over the first few weeks of school, I introduced the children to the Restorative Animals, one of whom is Crank the Croc. He can be a little snappy at times and needs understanding and a love bomb to help him to regulate his emotions. Two or three weeks after we had introduced these animals, I noticed one of the little girls in my class was behaving in a manner that was outside the norm for her, she was very sharp with the other children and seemed very frustrated in class. One Friday morning I asked her to have a chat outside the door. I started by telling her I noticed that she was acting differently and I asked “What happened?”. At which point she burst into tears and told me she was just feeling like Crank the Croc, things hadn’t gone according to plan at home that morning and she was in a very cranky mood. So I asked her what does Crank the Croc need to help him when he’s in a bad mood. She replied; “A love bomb” and I asked her what that looked like for her. With some suggestions and scaffolding she decided she’d like to sit beside her friend at lunch and to have five minutes in the Cool Down Corner. At the end of the day I rang her Mam to check in and discovered that the family were going through an extremely challenging time and that things were very emotionally turbulent at home. I have never been so glad that I took an empathetic approach, had I not and had I taken a more punitive approach I feel I would have destroyed my relationship with this student. I would have left school that day with little understanding of that child’s experience and no insight into how to support her for the rest of the school year.  Finally, Restorative Practice can act as a powerful lens through which you view your professional and personal interactions with others. A question I learned to ask through Restorative Practice is “Who do I want to be?” As educators we know there are times where so much of a situation is out of our control. This can lead to some very stressful situations when dealing with parents in particular. I find looking at a situation from the parents perspective and recognising that it’s rarely a personal issue with me, rather their deep concern for their child that causes anger and frustration. This helps me to deal with conflict. Also when having contentious meetings with parents I ask myself the question “Who do I want to be?”. It by no means guarantees that I will be met with the same level of empathy but if I can leave such a meeting feeling that I was kind, professional and empathetic well then I’m happy with the only side of the conversation I can actually control.
December 12, 2024
Sometimes, in my role as Guidance Counsellor, I get asked to intervene in situations where several consequences have already been implemented. One such example was a second year “feud” between a boy and a girl who had no dealings with each other in first year and were in the same class for the first time in Second year. Over the first few months, their bickering had escalated to Year Head intervention, detentions and still the teachers were reporting problems in the class. In fact, the whole class atmosphere had been impacted and the class was labelled the problematic one of Second year. “I felt powerless. I was confused, I couldn’t understand why she was treating me like this. I never spoke to her in First year and when we were put in class together this year she started sniggering and whispering to her friends every time I walked into class for no reason. ” (Boy X) These were the words of the boy in a preparation conversation before a Restorative Meeting. But they didn’t come easy. In the first round of the questions, I learned he was angry and that he thought his reputation was ruined. He couldn’t get beyond defending himself and making her out to be the ‘bad guy’. He wanted compensation and for the Year Head to call an assembly and tell the whole year he didn’t do ‘it’. At that stage, based on those answers, I was skeptical that there was a readiness for a Restorative Meeting between the two parties. In my work as an RP practitioner, I know that identifying what feelings reside behind the facts listed are where connection and empathy are built so I delved a little deeper – back to the start of the story rather than this specific incident. I followed the question protocol again and that’s when we started getting somewhere and he made the above revelation. This boy was very articulate, and I could empathise with the feelings he described. He described the mixed emotions of new beginnings, new classmates, and the added burden of this mysterious quarrel with a girl he didn’t know who just had it in for him. In an attempt to regain power, he began acting in a way that he wasn’t necessarily proud of but couldn’t think of approaching any differently. ‘Investigating’ the incident that landed them in my office wasn’t the priority, giving them clarity and a new path forward were.
September 5, 2024
Individual and Collective Accountability in a Restorative Framework
More Posts
Share by: